Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[DOWNLOAD] "De Haviland V. Warner Bros. Pictures Inc." by District Court of Appeal of California " Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

De Haviland V. Warner Bros. Pictures Inc.

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: De Haviland V. Warner Bros. Pictures Inc.
  • Author : District Court of Appeal of California
  • Release Date : January 08, 1944
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 72 KB

Description

Defendant has appealed from a judgment declaring at an end its contract for the services of plaintiff as a motion picture actress. The ground of the decision was that the contract had run for seven years, the maximum life allowed such contracts by former Civil Code, section 1980, now section 2855 of the Labor Code. It was executed April 14, 1936, for a term of fifty-two weeks and gave the employer the right to extend the term for any or all of six successive periods of fifty-two weeks each. These options were exercised from time to time by the employer so as to cover the entire contract period. The services commenced May 5, 1936, and, except as interrupted by certain periods of suspension, were continued to August 13, 1943. The present action was commenced August 23, 1943. The contract gave the producer, defendant, the right to suspend plaintiff for any period or periods when she should fail, refuse or neglect to perform her services to the full limit of her ability and as instructed by the producer and for any additional period or periods required to complete the portrayal of a role refused by plaintiff and assigned to another artist. Plaintiff was to receive no compensation while so suspended or thereafter until she offered to resume her work. It was provided that the producer had the right to extend the term of the contract at its option, for a time equal to the periods of suspension. There were several such suspensions after December 9, 1939, and one suspension of thirty days which plaintiff agreed to and which was occasioned by her illness. In each instance defendant exercised its right to extend the term of the agreement. The several periods of suspension totaled some twenty-five


Free PDF Books "De Haviland V. Warner Bros. Pictures Inc." Online ePub Kindle